What is the ʿAqīdah of the Salaf Regarding the Qurʾān? By Sh. Ibn ʿUthaymīn رَحِمَهُ اللهُ

Sh. Ibn ʿUthaymīn رَحِمَهُ اللهُ said:

“The ʿaqīdah (creed) of the Salaf regarding the Noble Qurʾān is like their ʿaqīdah regarding the rest of Allāh’s Names and Attributes, which is an ʿaqīdah built on what is indicated by the Book of Allāh and the Sunnah of His Messenger ﷺ.

All of us know, that Allāh سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَىٰ described the Qurʾān as being His Speech, and that it is revealed from Him. He تَعَالَىٰ said:

وَإِنْ أَحَدٌۭ مِّنَ ٱلْمُشْرِكِينَ ٱسْتَجَارَكَ فَأَجِرْهُ حَتَّىٰ يَسْمَعَ كَلَـٰمَ ٱللَّهِ ثُمَّ أَبْلِغْهُ مَأْمَنَهُۥ

[التوبة (٩) : ٦]

{And if any one of the polytheists seeks your protection, then grant him protection so that he may hear the Speech of Allāh, then escort him to his place of safety} [al-Tawbah (9): 6].

The intent of the Speech of Allāh here, without doubt, is the Noble Qurʾān, and He تَعَالَىٰ said:

قُلْ نَزَّلَهُۥ رُوحُ ٱلْقُدُسِ مِن رَّبِّكَ

[النحل (١٦) : ١٠٢]

{Say, (O Muḥammad), “The Pure Spirit (i.e., Jibrīl) has brought it down from your Lord} [al-Naḥl (16): 102].

And Allāh عَزَّ وَجَلَّ said:

إِنَّ هَـٰذَا ٱلْقُرْءَانَ يَقُصُّ عَلَىٰ بَنِىٓ إِسْرَٰٓءِيلَ أَكْثَرَ ٱلَّذِى هُمْ فِيهِ يَخْتَلِفُونَ ۝١٠٢

[النمل (٢٧) : ٧٦]

{Indeed, this Qurʾān relates to the Children of Israel most of that over which they disagree} [al-Naml (27): 76].

So the Qurʾān is the Speech of Allāh تَعَالَىٰ in wording and meaning; Allāh spoke it in a real sense, and He spoke it to Jibrīl the trustworthy one. Then Jibrīl descended with it, upon the heart of the Prophet ﷺ, so that he could be from the warners in a clear Arabic tongue.

The Salaf believe that the Qurʾān is revealed [in the sense that] Allāh sent it down upon Muḥammad ﷺ in instalments, over 23 years, according to what Allāh’s wisdom necessitated. Furthermore, some of the revelation came down due to a particular cause necessitating its revelation (سَبَبِيًّا), and some of it came down without a particular cause (اِبْتِدَائِيًّا), and some of it would come down narrating a condition that had passed amongst the Prophet ﷺ and his Companions, and some of it would descend regarding legal rulings unconnected to a particular cause, according to what the people of knowledge in this field mention.

Thereafter, the Salaf say that the Qurʾān initiated from Allāh, and to Him it will return at the end of time – this is the view of the Salaf regarding the Noble Qurʾān.

It is not hidden to us, that Allāh تَعَالَىٰ described the Noble Qurʾān with great descriptions: He described it as full of wisdom, as noble, as great, and as glorious. These descriptions with which Allāh described His Speech, are for those who grab hold onto this Book and act upon it externally and internally, for indeed Allāh will bring about for him glory, greatness, wisdom, honour, and authority, which those who do not hold onto the Book of Allāh will not have. This is why I call upon, from this minbar, all of the Muslims; both rulers and ruled, scholars and commonfolk, to grab hold onto the Book of Allāh externally and internally so that they may have honour, aid, glory, and domination all over the earth. And I ask Allāh to help us to achieve that.”

Source: Majmūʿ Fatāwá wa Rasāʾil Faḍīlat al-Shaykh Muḥammad b. Ṣāliḥ al-ʿUthaymīn, 1: 305, no. 120.

Should the Mu’adhin Break His Fast First, or Give the Adhan First?

Sh. al-Albānī (رَحِمَهُ اللهُ) was asked whether the prayer-caller (الْمُؤَذِّنُ) should break his fast first, or give the adhān first. The Shaykh replied that he does share such an intricately meticulous outlook on this issue. Whichever of the two the prayer-caller decides to do is permissible.

He was then asked whether the fasting person can continue to fast after the time has ended. He replied that just as it is permissible to give the adhān in the beginning of the time, it is also permissible for him to break his fast in the beginning of the time. So, whether he does it first, or afterwards, the Shaykh does not have a preference for one over the other for him to say that one should break his fast first and then give the adhān, or for him to say one should give the adhān first and then break his fast.

Source: Jāmiʿ Turāth al-ʿAllāmah al-Albānī fī al-Fiqh (10: 199).

Breaking Your Fast – Do You Eat First, or Pray First?

Anas b. Mālik reported from the Prophet ﷺ that he said:

If the iqāmah for prayer is given while one of you is fasting, let him begin with the evening meal before the Maghrib prayer, and do not rush from your evening meal.”

Sh. al-Albānī (رَحِمَهُ اللهُ) mentions that the addition “while one of you is fasting” does not negate other narrations which omit these words because the versions without these additional words are still absolute in any case, thereby encompassing the one who is fasting, and the one who is not. Rather, the fasting person is more deserving of this concession than the non-fasting person, as is obvious.

Source: Jāmiʿ Turāth al-ʿAllāmah al-Albānī fī al-Fiqh (10: 177). See: al-Ṣaḥīḥah (3964).

The Certificate of Ramadan

Sh. Mashhūr b. Ḥasan Āl Salmān (حفظه الله) said regarding the purpose of fasting:

“Fasting is obligatory upon us just as it was obligatory upon those before us, as He the Almighty and Majestic stated:

{O you who believe, fasting has been prescribed for you just as it was prescribed for those before you, so that you may attain taqwá}

This fast is a school, and this school, the one who graduates from it must graduate with a certificate, and this certificate is the certificate of taqwá.

But what is taqwá? It is to place a protective barrier between you and what Allāh has forbidden.”

Source: Kayfa Nastaqbilu Shahr Ramaḍān (28m onwards) – YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/clip/Ugkxqzqk8Nu8p9Zb2bXpaaUnmVYUV8EuXIU8

Are Good Deeds and Bad Deeds Multiplied During Ramadan? Sh. al-Albani (may Allah have mercy upon him)

Sh. al-Albānī (رحمه الله) was asked whether optional deeds, in a general sense, are multiplied, and also evil deeds. He replied:

“There is no explicit scriptural-text (نَصٌّ) in the Divine Law stating that good deeds are multiplied, and likewise evil deeds with respect to the virtue of [a particular] place, or virtue of [a particular] time…virtue of a place such as Makkah or al-Madīnah for example…or virtue of a time such as this month of ours, this month of Ramaḍān.

There is no explicit scriptural-text regarding good deeds or evil ones being multiplied. However, some scholars say, by way of deduction (اسْتِنْبَاطًا), that they are multiplied…by way of deduction i.e., not [based on] a scriptural-text but only independent reasoning (اجْتِهَادًا), so if a person says: “good deeds are multiplied”, there is no harm in that because it is the view of some scholars, however it is not permissible to be definitive in that regard.”

Source: Jāmiʿ Turāth al-ʿAllāmah al-Albānī fī al-Fiqh (10: 109).

Warning Against Not Acting on One’s Knowledge

بِسْمِ اللهِ الرَّحْمٰنِ الرَّحِيْمِ

This post includes āyāt, aḥādīth, āthār, and statements of the scholars warning against not acting on one’s knowledge.

I will continuously update the post with new quotes as I come across them – in shāʾa Allāh.

Why Don’t You Practice What You Preach?!

يَـٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ لِمَ تَقُولُونَ مَا لَا تَفْعَلُونَ ۝٢ كَبُرَ مَقْتًا عِنْدَ ٱللَّهِ أَنْ تَقُولُوا۟ مَا لَا تَفْعَلُونَ ۝٣

[الصف (٦١) : ٢-٣]

{O you who believe, why do you say what you do not do? Greatly hateful in the sight of Allāh is that you say what you do not do}

[al-Ṣaff (61): 2-3]

Donkeys Carrying Books

مَثَلُ ٱلَّذِينَ حُمِّلُوا۟ ٱلتَّوْرَىٰةَ ثُمَّ لَمْ يَحْمِلُوهَا كَمَثَلِ ٱلْحِمَارِ يَحْمِلُ أَسْفَارًۢا ۚ بِئْسَ مَثَلُ ٱلْقَوْمِ ٱلَّذِينَ كَذَّبُوا۟ بِـَٔايَـٰتِ ٱللَّهِ ۚ وَٱللَّهُ لَا يَهْدِى ٱلْقَوْمَ ٱلظَّـٰلِمِينَ ۝٥

[الجمعة (٦٢) : ٥]

{The example of those who were entrusted with observing the Tawrāh but then failed to do so, is that of a donkey carrying books. How evil is the example of those who reject Allāh’s signs! And Allāh does not guide the wrongdoing people}

[al-Jumuʿah (62): 5]

Deviation From Not Acting on Knowledge

وَٱتْلُ عَلَيْهِمْ نَبَأَ ٱلَّذِىٓ ءَاتَيْنَـٰهُ ءَايَـٰتِنَا فَٱنسَلَخَ مِنْهَا فَأَتْبَعَهُ ٱلشَّيْطَـٰنُ فَكَانَ مِنَ ٱلْغَاوِينَ ۝١٧٥ وَلَوْ شِئْنَا لَرَفَعْنَـٰهُ بِهَا وَلَـٰكِنَّهُۥٓ أَخْلَدَ إِلَى ٱلْأَرْضِ وَٱتَّبَعَ هَوَىٰهُ ۚ فَمَثَلُهُۥ كَمَثَلِ ٱلْكَلْبِ إِن تَحْمِلْ عَلَيْهِ يَلْهَثْ أَوْ تَتْرُكْهُ يَلْهَث ۚ ذَّٰلِكَ مَثَلُ ٱلْقَوْمِ ٱلَّذِينَ كَذَّبُوا۟ بِـَٔايَـٰتِنَا ۚ فَٱقْصُصِ ٱلْقَصَصَ لَعَلَّهُمْ يَتَفَكَّرُونَ ۝١٧٦

[الأعراف (٧) : ١٧٥-١٧٦]

{And recite to them, [O Muḥammad], the news of him to whom We gave [knowledge of] Our signs, but he detached himself from them; so Satan pursued him, and he became of the deviators.

And if We had willed, We could have elevated him thereby, but he adhered [instead] to the earth and followed his own desire. So his example is like that of the dog: if you chase him, he pants, or if you leave him, he [still] pants. That is the example of the people who denied Our signs. So, relate the stories that perhaps they will give thought}.

[al-Aʿrāf (7): 175-176]

Forgetting What You Used to Know

فَبِمَا نَقْضِهِم مِّيثَـٰقَهُمْ لَعَنَّـٰهُمْ وَجَعَلْنَا قُلُوبَهُمْ قَـٰسِيَةًۭ ۖ يُحَرِّفُونَ ٱلْكَلِمَ عَن مَّوَاضِعِهِۦ ۙ وَنَسُوا۟ حَظًّۭا مِّمَّا ذُكِّرُوا۟ بِهِۦ ۚ وَلَا تَزَالُ تَطَّلِعُ عَلَىٰ خَآئِنَةٍۢ مِّنْهُمْ إِلَّا قَلِيلًۭا مِّنْهُمْ ۖ فَٱعْفُ عَنْهُمْ وَٱصْفَحْ ۚ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ يُحِبُّ ٱلْمُحْسِنِينَ  ۝١٣

[المائدة (٥) : ١٣]

{So for their breaking of the covenant We cursed them and made their hearts hardened. They distort words from their [proper] places [i.e., usages] and have forgotten a portion of that of which they were reminded. And you will still observe deceit among them, except a few of them. But pardon them and overlook [their misdeeds]. Indeed, Allāh loves the doers of good}.

[al-Māʾidah (5): 13]

What Did You Do with Your Knowledge?

عَنِ ابْنِ مَسْعُودٍ : عَنِ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ قَالَ : (( لَا تَزُولُ قَدَمَا ابْنِ آدَمَ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ مِنْ عِنْدِ رَبِّهِ حَتَّىٰ يُسْأَلَ عَنْ خَمْسٍ : عَنْ عُمْرِهِ فِيْمَ أَفْنَاهُ، وَعَنْ شَبَابِهِ فِيْمَ أَبْلَاهُ، وَعَنْ مَالِهِ مِنْ أَيْنَ اكْتَسَبَهُ، وَفِيْمَ أَنْفَقَهُ، وَمَاذَا عَمِلَ فِيْمَا عَلِمَ )) . رَوَاهُ التِّرْمِذِيُّ.

حسن : الترمذي (٢٤١٦) وفي ط. دار التأصيل (٢٥٩٧). أبو يعلى (٥٢٧١). الطبراني في «الكبير» (٩٧٧٢)، وفي «الصغير» (٧٦٠). عن عمره : عن مدة أجله. فيما أفناه : صرفه. عن شبابه : عن قوته في وسط عمره. فيما أبلاه : ضيعه. عن ماله من أين اكتسبه : أمن حرام أو حلال؟ وفيما أنفقه : طاعة أو معصية؟

On the authority of Ibn Masʿūd who narrated from the Prophet ﷺ, who said:

“The two feet of the son of Ādam will not move on the Day of Judgement from the presence of his Lord until he is asked about five things: about his life and how he spent it, about his youth and how he wore it out, about his wealth wherefrom he acquired it, and how he spent it, and what he did with what he knew.”

Reported by al-Tirmidhī.

Ḥasan: al-Tirmidhī (2416) and in the Dār al-Taʾṣīl edition (2597).

Punishment for Not Practising What One Preaches

عَنْ أُسَامَةَ بْنِ زَيْدٍ قَالَ : سَمِعْتُ رَسُولَ اللهِ ﷺ يَقُولُ : (( يُؤْتَىٰ بِالرَّجُلِ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ، فَيُلْقَىٰ فِي النَّارِ، فَتَنْدَلِقُ أَقْتَابُ بَطْنِهِ فَيَدُورُ بِهَا كَمَا يَدُورُ الْحِمَارُ بِالرَّحَىٰ ، فَيَجْتَمِعُ إِلَيْهِ أَهْلُ النَّارِ فَيَقُولُونَ : يَا فُلَانُ! مَا لَكَ؟ أَلَمْ تَكُنْ تَأْمُرُ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ وَتَنْهَىٰ عَنِ الْمُنْكَرِ؟ فَيَقُولُ : بَلَىٰ، قَدْ كُنْتُ آمُرُ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ وَلَا آتِيْهِ، وَأَنْهَىٰ عَنِ الْمُنْكَرِ وَآتِيْهِ )) . مُتَّفَقٌ عَلَيْهِ، وَاللَّفْظُ لِمُسْلِمٍ.

صحيح : البخاري (٣٢٦٧). مسلم (٢٩٨٩)

On the authority of Usāmah b. Zayd who said: “I heard Allāh’s Messenger ﷺ say:

A man will be brought on the Day of Resurrection and thrown into the Fire; his intestines will spill forth, and he will go around them as a donkey goes around the millstone. The people of the fire will gather around him and say: ‘O so-and-so, what is the matter with you? Did you not used to enjoin good and forbid evil?’ He will say: ‘Yes, but I used to enjoin good and not do it, and I used to forbid evil and do it.’”

Agreed upon, and the wording is that of Muslim.

Not Knowledgeable Until One Acts on His ʿIlm

قَالَ الْخَطِيْبُ الْبَغْدَادِيُّ فِي «اقْتِضَاءُ الْعِلْمِ الْعَمَل» (ﺻ. ١٤) :

ثُمَّ إِنِّي مُوصِيْكَ يَا طَالِبَ الْعِلْمِ بِإِخْلَاصِ النِّيَّةِ فِي طَلَبِهِ وَإِجْهَادِ النَّفْسِ عَلَىٰ الْعَمَلِ بِمُوجِبِهِ، فَإِنَّ الْعِلْمَ شَجَرَةٌ، وَالْعَمَلُ ثَمَرَةٌ، وَلَيْسَ يُعَدُّ عَالِمًا مَنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ بِعِلْمِهِ عَامِلاً

al-Khaṭīb al-Baghdādī said in page 14 of his book “Iqtiḍāʾ al-ʿIlm al-ʿAmal” (Knowledge Mandates Action): “[To proceed] then, I advise you O student of knowledge, to have sincerity in intention in seeking it [i.e., knowledge], and exerting the soul in acting in accordance with it, for indeed knowledge is a tree, and action is a fruit, and the one who does not act on his knowledge is not considered knowledgeable.”

Loss of Credibility

قَالَ الْخَطِيْبُ الْبَغْدَادِيُّ فِي «اقْتِضَاءُ الْعِلْمِ الْعَمَل» (ﺻ. ١٤) :

وَمَا شَيْءٌ أَضْعَفَ مِنْ عَالِمٍ تَرَكَ النَّاسُ عِلْمَهُ لِفَسَادِ طَرِيْقَتِهِ وَجَاهِلٍ أَخَذَ النَّاسُ بِجَهْلِهِ لِنَظَرِهِمْ إِلَىٰ عِبَادَتِهِمْ

al-Khaṭīb al-Baghdādī said in page 14 of his book “Iqtiḍāʾ al-ʿIlm al-ʿAmal” (Knowledge Mandates Action):

“There is nothing feebler than a scholar whose knowledge people abandon due to his corrupt ways, and an ignoramus whose ignorance people adopt due to them looking at his worship.”

قَالَ الزُّهْرِيُّ

لَا يُوَثَّقُ لِلنَّاسِ عَمَلُ عَامِلٍ لَا يَعْلَمُ، وَلَا يُرْضَىٰ بِقَوْلِ عَالِمٍ لَا يَعْمَلُ

أَخْرَجَهُ الْخَطِيْبُ الْبَغْدَادِيُّ فِي «اقْتِضَاءُ الْعِلْمِ الْعَمَل» (١٣)

al-Zuhrī (d. 124) said:

“People do not trust the action of a doer who has no knowledge, nor are they pleased with the statement of one who knows but does not act.”

Reported by al-Khaṭīb al-Baghdādī in Iqtiḍāʾ al-ʿIlm al-ʿAmal (no. 13).

Unspent Treasure

قَالَ أَبُو هُرَيْرَةَ

مَثَلُ عِلْمٍ لَا يُعْمَلُ بِهِ كَمَثَلِ كَنْزٍ لَا يُنْفَقُ مِنْهُ فِي سَبِيْلِ اللهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ

أَخْرَجَهُ الْخَطِيْبُ الْبَغْدَادِيُّ فِي «اقْتِضَاءُ الْعِلْمِ الْعَمَل» (١٢)

Abū Hurayrah (d. 59) said:

“The example of knowledge which is not implemented is like that of a treasure which is not spent from in the path of Allāh the Almighty and Majestic.”

Reported by al-Khaṭīb al-Baghdādī in Iqtiḍāʾ al-ʿIlm al-ʿAmal (no. 12).

Abū ʿUthmān al-Nahdī (c. 100)

Senior Successor, Imām, proof, the scholar of his time, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān b. Mull or Mill but it is also said to be Ibn Malī, lived through al-Jāhiliyyah and al-Islām and so is mukhaḍram, he accepted Islām during the Prophet’s ﷺ life but did not have the opportunity to meet him, lived long (130 years or so), went on military expeditions during the Caliphate of ʿUmar and many other expeditions after ʿUmar’s passing.

He narrated from ʿUmar (d. 23), ʿAlī (d. 40), Ibn Masʿūd (d. 32), Ubayy b. Kaʿb (d. 30), Bilāl (d. 20), Saʿd b. Abī Waqqāṣ (d. 55), Salmān al-Fārisī (d. 33), Ḥudhayfah b. al-Yamān (d. 36), Abū Mūsá al-Ashʿarī (d. 42), Usāmah b. Zayd (c. 53), Abū Hurayrah (d. 59), Ibn ʿAbbās (d. 68) and others.

Those who narrated from him include Qatādah (d. 117), Sulaymān al-Taymī (d. 143), Ayyūb al-Sakhtiyānī (d. 131), and others.

He took part in the Battle of al-Yarmūk in the year 15H against the Byzantine Empire. He was declared reliable by ʿAlī b. al-Madīnī (d. 234), Abū Zurʿah (d. 264) and others. He performed Ḥajj and ʿUmrah 60 times, accompanied the Companion Salmān al-Fārisī (d. 33) for 12 years, would pray until he would become unconscious, and it is said he would pray 100 units between al-Maghrib and al-ʿIshāʾ. He was graded reliable by Abū Ḥātim (d. 277).

Siyar, 4: 175.

ʿAbd al-Raḥmān b. Ḥasan Āl al-Shaykh (d. 1285)

Grandson of Imām Muḥammad b. ʿAbd al-Wahhāb (d. 1206), born in the year 1196 in the city of al-Dirʿiyyah which was the centre of the Salafī Daʿwah and its scholars. His father was killed in battle and so his grandfather, Imām Muḥammad b. ʿAbd al-Wahhāb took care of him until he also passed away when ʿAbd al-Raḥmān was around 13 years old. He attended his grandfather’s lessons, memorised the Qurʾān, and then studied further under the senior students of his grandfather. He authored a commentary on his grandfather’s Kitāb al-Tawḥīd (The Book of Islamic Monotheism) entitled Fatḥ al-Majīd. He lived for almost 90 years. May Allāh have mercy upon him.

Advice

When purchasing a copy of Fatḥ al-Majīd, ensure you obtain the edition which contains Imām ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz b. Bāz’s (d. 1420) remarks in the footnotes. The Salafī scholar, editor and annotator, Sh. Muḥammad Ḥāmid al-Faqī (d. 1378) annotated an edition of Fatḥ al-Majīd, however Imām Ibn Bāz noticed some mistakes therein and so he reviewed the work and corrected those mistakes. May Allāh reward them both for their efforts.

Bibliography

See: Sh. Ibrāhīm b. Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm Āl al-Shaykh’s biography of him in Fatḥ al-Majīd edited by Ashraf b. ʿAbd al-Maqṣūd and published by Muʾassasat Qurṭubah in Cairo (no date). The biography was taken from Rawḍat al-Afkār of the historian, and student of Imām Muḥammad b. ʿAbd al-Wahhāb, Ibn Ghannām (d. 1225).

al-Tiwalah: Definition from Lisān al-ʿArab of Ibn Manẓūr

Ibn Manẓūr says in Lisān al-ʿArab:

“And al-tiwalah, with kasr of the tāʾ is what causes the wife to be loved by her husband. And in al-Muḥkam: al-tiwalah is what causes love between a man and woman.”

Ibn Manẓūr quotes Ibn al-Athīr as saying: “al-Tiwalah – with kasr of the tāʾ and fatḥ of the waw – is what causes the wife to be loved by her husband through magic (siḥr) and besides. Ibn Masʿūd made it a part of shirk (polytheism) because of their belief that it causes, and does, what is contrary to what Allāh the Exalted decrees.”

Ibn al-Aʿrābī said, “tālayatūlu is to treat with al-tiwalah which is magic (siḥr).”

What is al-Tiwalah? By Sh. Muhammad b. Salih al-‘Uthaymin

Sh. Muḥammad b. Ṣāliḥ al-ʿUthaymīn, may Allāh have mercy upon him, said:

“al-Tiwalah is something [people] do claiming that it causes a woman to be loved by her husband and vice versa. The closest [term] to that is what is referred amongst us as al-diblah (ring). It is said that the husband inscribes his wife’s name in his ring, and the wife inscribes her husband’s name in her ring, and they claim that they – the couple – attain love and affection through this action of theirs, and that if he removes the ring, or she removes it, it means [their] separation.

So, if one asks: what is the means for a man to love his wife and his wife to love her husband? We say: the means to that has been explained by Allāh in His statement: {And live with them in a good manner} [al-Nisāʾ (4): 19]. So, if a person lives in a good manner with his wife, and she does likewise; love, closeness and blissful married life occurs.”

Source: Fatāwá Nūr ʿalá al-Darb (1: 107-8, no. 77).

Note:

One of the many notable and beneficial features of Sh. al-ʿUthaymīn’s works, is that he always tries to provide a divinely legislated solution, and alternative, to something which is prohibited in the Dīn. May Allāh bless him with all goodness.